Fear And Loathing In The Blue Mountains

From the Hunter. S. Thompson Fetishists’ Stroke Site (Please feel free to take your copy of ‘Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas’ with you into the booth and, sir, please use the tissues provided) known as MachineGunKeyboard:

Sue the bloggers ’til they shut up - ‘cos it works

Monday August 10th 2009, 3:55 am

Hmmm! Now where have we seen THAT tactic before? Funny how the Left squeal and shriek like stuck pigs when they are on the RECEIVING end of legal intimidation.

“Blogs are all about opinion and interactivity. If what you have to say isn’t controversial, it’s probably not worth saying. The interactivity comes in the comments. Good blogs get insightful commenters. Great blogs get stalkers. Brilliant blogs get legal threats. slackbastard, published by Melbourne’s @ndy, is a sledgehammer in the hand of a skilled yet rabid wordsmith.”

Rabid? Well certainly! Skilled? At WHAT precisely? You’ve just GOT to be kidding, right? Extracting the old urine a mite there, eh? Oh dear, that ol’ Weezster just cracks us up!!! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! And we’ve never heard a penis referred to as a ‘sledgehammer’.

“@ndy covers current events from an anarchist/anti-corporate and anti-racist perspective.”

Oh yeah? You mean like his own mind numbingly BORING ‘Homage To Catalonia’ style wanky, pseudo reminiscent fantasies about the ‘glorious’ days of the old and original Red Brigade?

“@ndy normally forges intense, insightful, well researched bits,”

Well researched? Indeed? I believe you’ll find more than the odd one or two challenges to THOSE claims. It's a tough choice for who gets the gong for sheer ineptness between @ndy and Cam Smith.

“but every once in a while he’ll”

What? Make a complete and utter FUCK UP?

"fire off a short sharp mortar round. Such was the case in January 2008, when @ndy published “Aaarrrggghhh! Dylan Lewis! Tania Lacy! So Much Hate!”

@ndy locks & loads:

Uh, oh! That's nasthty gun talk, isn't it Weezy old chum?

Number Ones

“Dylan Fucking Lewis is back on my TV screen, this time acting zany while flogging mobile phones belonging to Crazy John.”

And the point would be?

“According to a culture industry source “Dylan Lewis is a multi-skilled musician and media personality who can entertain and keep a crowd engaged anywhere, anytime!” but I think he’s actually one of the most annoying cunts to ever be spat out of a womb.”

We actually AGREE that he IS indeed an extremely tiresome eejit…BUT…why pick on HIM in particular when there are so many other richly deserving Left Wing targets like…umm…let’s think…the entire ensemble of The Chaser for instance or how about those old has-beens from The Panel? Or the Gruen Transfer ‘tards? Why poor little Dylan? Did you discover his grandfather was once a Sturmführer in the Waffen SS or something even worse like voted for Pauline Hanson?

“The rare experience of hosting an abundance of television shows combined with his professionalism, elite talent and ‘wow’ factor allows him to deliver at the highest level”, but substitute “thick eyebrows” for “professionalism”, “dickheadedness” for “elite talent” and “vomit-inducing” for “wow” and I think you’ll be much closer to the truth.”

Funnily, or perhaps not, those last few descriptors suit the FDB crew PERFECTLY!

“Caulfield Fucking Grammar has a lot to answer for, that’s for sure.”

FUCKING Grammar? Oh, these Lefty ‘wordsmiths’ truly are masters of the language!

“Even with my not knowing who the hell Dylan Lewis is, @ndy’s satirical Hunter S. Thompsonesque spray cracked me up.”

You AND @ndy are not worthy to sniff Hunter’s fossilised skid marked shorts. Dickhead that he was, HE at least did have some real talent and was a genuine original. YOU are a pair of farking LOSERS!

19 months later, @ndy gets an amusing email:

Dear Sir,

We represent Dylan Lewis. It has come to our notice that a website titled “slackbastards” which appears to be controlled or owned by you has made reference to Dylan. Under the subheading “Number One’s” references to Dylan of a defamatory nature have been made. We have obtained legal advice confirming the status of the material as being offensive and defamatory. We seek to have the article/paragraph removed immediately from the website.

Should you not remove the offending material we are instructed to brief solicitors on behalf of our client to seek an injunction and damages.

Mark Klemens
Managing Director
Profile Talent Management
323 Montague St,
Albert Park, Victoria
Australia 3206
MKlemens@profiletalent.com.au
T: +613 8598 7810
M: 0412 386 765

O RLY?

@ndy replied to Klemens:

Dear Mark,

Thank you for your email.

First, two very minor corrections.

The title of the blog is ’slackbastard’, not ’slackbastards’; the subheading is ‘Number Ones’ not ‘Number One’s’.

Secondly, a few questions.

1. Could you please identify precisely which passages, and which terms, in the paragraph below, that you allege to be defamatory?

======

Number Ones

Dylan Fucking Lewis is back on my TV screen, this time acting zany while flogging mobile phones belonging to Crazy John. According to a culture industry source “Dylan Lewis is a multi-skilled musician and media personality who can entertain and keep a crowd engaged anywhere, anytime!” but I think he’s actually one of the most annoying cunts to ever be spat out of a womb. “The rare experience of hosting an abundance of television shows combined with his professionalism, elite talent and ‘wow’ factor allows him to deliver at the highest level”, but substitute “thick eyebrows” for “professionalism”, “dickheadedness” for “elite talent” and “vomit-inducing” for “wow” and I think you’ll be much closer to the truth.

Caulfield Fucking Grammar has a lot to answer for, that’s for sure.

======

2. Could you please explain to me why you seek the removal of the article as a whole?

3. Further, given that the post was made on January 4, 2008, why was your email sent 19 months later, on August 6, 2009?

4. I have received four comments in response to my post of January 4, 2008. I am unaware of anyone else paying it any attention other than yourself. Given that this is the case, could you please explain to me what ‘damages’ have been inflicted upon Dylan Lewis?

Klemens replies:

I refer to my previous email. Should the paragraph as requested not be removed within 48 hours then I will seek our clients instructions to brief solicitors forthwith to commence proceedings against you. Our client will seek an injunction and damages. The result will mean, inter alia, substantial costs orders against you. Please confirm by return when the paragraph has been removed.

Mark Klemens
Managing Director
Profile Talent Management
323 Montague St,
Albert Park, Victoria
Australia 3206
MKlemens@profiletalent.com.au
T: +613 8598 7810
M: 0412 386 765

inter alia! Wow, is that French? mmrrrowr.

Klemens pretends to not understand that one person’s honestly held opinion of another, such as @ndy’s opinion that Dylan Lewis is ‘annoying,’ cannot be claimed to be a defamation. Such speech is protected under Australian law as ‘fair comment.’ @ndy has not accused Lewis of any unlawful activity nor accused him of an act which he has not committed. @ndy merely offers his opinion of Lewis as ‘annoying.’

As I said, I had no idea who Dylan Lewis was before @ndy let me in on this note from Lewis’ agent. I did some looking about; Lewis is apparently a DJ on a Melbourne radio station. His Nova100-FM bio says:

[...] Dylan then went on to do a couple more music telly shows - ‘The 10:30 Slot’ and ‘Pepsi Live’, and then he appeared in ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ (which he won because of his amazing style he learnt as a boy in Adelaide), ‘Celebrity Circus’, and ‘Celebrity Nob-ends’. Clearly the use of the word ‘Celebrity’ in these shows was an overstatement and pretty much marked the end of his TV career. So he moved to England for a while to drink pints. Upon his return and David Bowie-ish reinvention, he landed a gig at Nova and has been there ever since. Dylan had a little bit of experience in radio having had a go at PBS and JJJ a little bit during his ‘Celebrity’ years. But he wasn’t very adept at it so had to sleep with the boss and be a gimp for a few weeks in order to get the gig.

He’s very glad he prostituted himself [per barista in comments, why doesn't Klemens threaten to sue Nova for defaming his client as a prostitute, hmm? -weez] though because now he’s less shit at radio and wants to stay forever. [...]

You know what? @ndy’s right- Lewis IS annoying. Anyone who had anything to do with ‘Celebrity Big Brother’ would be so by definition. Due to defamation law reform in Australia in recent times, you can no longer defame with truth. However, a defamation case defendant making a claim of ‘fair comment’ need not even prove the truth of the statement, rather only state that the comment was based on their honestly held opinion to prevail against any defamation claim.

Hmmm...could THIS be the reason perhaps that the FDB wankers have gradually ceased their rapid fire threats of 'legal action' against many White Nationalist Patriot activists EVERY farking time they expose more immoral and illegal activities indulged in by the so-called 'AntiFa'?

Electronic Frontiers Australia notes:

[...] there are several defences for defamation, including truth and fair comment. If the statements are either true or are phrased in the terms where it appears that the maker is giving an opinion rather than a statement of truth, then the maker is unlikely to be liable for defamation.

Furthermore…

SUPREME COURT RULES 2000 - REG 263K
263K. Defence of fair comment

(1) A defence of fair comment at common law is sufficiently pleaded if it alleges that the matter complained of was a comment that –

(a) was based on –

(i) true fact; or

(ii) material that was published under privilege; and

(b) related to a matter of public interest; and

(c) was made honestly by the defendant.

While he IS annoying, I don’t think that Lewis necessarily fits @ndy’s colourful characterisation as the ‘one of the most annoying cunts to ever be spat out of a womb.’ The ultimate honour goes to Mark Klemens, who thinks he can heavy a blogger into silence with lawyery shit for said blogger expressing their honestly held opinion about a public figure.

Clearly, Klemens is just hoping @ndy will piss his pants and pass out upon receipt of a couple of brief yet lawyery sounding bluff emails. Given the ironclad protections afforded to speakers under ‘fair comment’ specifications, Klemens would not only have zero chance of success in a defamation claim, he’d unquestionably find himself liable for @ndy’s costs incurred in defending the case.

The possibility exists that Klemens will do a lot more damage to Lewis’ career than @ndy ever could through the Streisand Effect. The world now knows that Lewis has a bullying, threatening cockhead for an agent and thus will be as well-known for that as anything else.

I wonder what the remainder of Klemens’ clients think of being represented by an agent who bullies bloggers over legitimate fair comment. There’s no doubt they’d be unhappy with having to pay defendants’ legal costs associated with any such ill-considered action.

However, I fully support Klemens’ decision to sue bloggers. Nothing pumps up the readership numbers like an arrogant millionaire former barrister who tries to suppress the public expressions of a hobbyist writer with a team of lawyers. Suing bloggers definitely shuts them up, too. This item you’re reading is prima facie evidence of that, innit?

Awaiting my writ. Don’t you want one, too?

-weez

Well, Weezy old bean (or is that HAS BEEN?) YOU have been the very worst offender over the years for firing off (as it turns out, imaginary) writs. How's it feel to be a potential victim of your own favourite tactics?

14 Comments

14 Comments so far
Leave a comment

fascinating that Kklemens ProfileTalent is financed by StevveVizzard who has said dreadful things about other people while doing skits on the ComedyCompany.

hypocrisy is so dangerous and loathesome.

Well, Fight Dem Back just about has hypocrisy monopolised.

Comment by Marshall Stacks 08.10.09 @ 3:32 pm
in the reply email to andy,
none of his questions are answered, but
he gets instead,
the THREAT that he will incur
“substantial costs orders against you - frightening him, not with Law, but with Expense.
as Shakespeare wrote ‘first, let’s kill all the lawyers,”

Oh GOODY! Can we start with Darp? Or…perhaps not. He is unlikely to ever become a lawyer now due to the brave and heroic actions of certain unnamed White Australian Patriots.

Comment by Ann O'Dyne 08.10.09 @ 3:38 pm
It is not possible to further DEFAME any person who has put themselves on BigBrother.

not.

possible.

Comment by Bwca Brownie 08.10.09 @ 3:43 pm
This is fascinating too.

It appears that the media career of MK began with hostage DouglasWood.

WAG THE DOUG - An Eyewitness Bloug Your Democracy

Industrial barrister Mark Klemens, the front man for the agency, is Molly Meldrum’s manager and was the beak who got Darryll Ssomers off a drink driving …

Comment by Bwca Brownie 08.10.09 @ 3:50 pm
An Ode to A Toad

Raise a glass to Dylan F. Lewis
Whose brownshirt Klemens came here to screw us.
A boil, a blister, a posterior chancre
He’s Nova100’s annoying midmorning wanker.

Far too mundane to be Vyle and Jackie
Dylan’s only insipid when he tries to be wacky.
Annoying and boring, a self-interested tool
A lumpy brown lump in our FM cesspool.

Run away, hide and cover your head
You better go cower down under your bed.
‘Cos it’s morning again, it’s 9am soon
When Nova will bring us their lit-igi-ous goon.

-Hornsley W. Dickham
Doggerelist-in-residence
Comment by Dewey, Dickham & Howe Attorneys-at-Law 08.10.09 @ 3:57 pm

Ah, this is wonderful. There is a defence of satire - though I was a bit unsure until I read Nova’s own description of this person - they ACCUSE HIM OF PROSTITUTION. Why doesn’t his agent sue them? Because they know the statement is ironic and hyperbolic.

And the offending statements from slackbastard are …. what, exactly?

Personally I think the insult is shabby and basic, but threatening to sue someone with a case which you know a) you probably can’t win and b) would trash your client’s reputation if you tried, rather lacks the kind of idealism that creates pride on yer deathbed.
Comment by barista 08.10.09 @ 10:10 pm

David, your notation of Nova100 defaming their own is indeed an astute observation. Mind you, I expect Lewis wrote his own bio entry.

@ndy’s adjectives are profane and in-your-face, but in sum, he still only expresses an opinion that Lewis is ‘annoying.’

Naturally, Klemens won’t and would never have sued @ndy. Also, I’m quite certain that I’ll never hear from Klemens regarding what I have republished, despite it being verbatim quotation of @ndy. Why? It’s all bluff & bluster, intended to frighten bloggers into silence. Didn’t work on @ndy, would never have worked on me, either. If you follow twitter at all, you already know that Klemens’ bluster has fully backfired.

Again, much as FDB's bluff and bluster has backfired on THEM. FDB currently has all the credibility of the proverbial Three Dollar Note.

The mere threat of suing a blogger is newsworthy. It’s a classic David & Goliath tale, and in such a scenario, you definitely don’t want to be Goliath- it’s a PR disaster.

While you’d expect a lawyer not to care about PR disasters, you’d similarly expect a talent agent to know better.

Klemens, in the depths of his arrogance, figures bloggers for bumpkins. I’m quite sure there’s a few non-legal practitioner amateur writers on various online modes who would, as I said in my post body, piss their pants and pass out on receipt of a couple of lawyery sounding emails. However, bloggers are not anyone’s idea of a homogeneous group. Just because one writes a blog doesn’t mean they’re wet behind the ears. There’s just as many grizzled online writers who’ve been down the rosy garden path many times before. Like you, David, I was a professional writer, a radio journo in my case, for decades before anyone coined the term ‘blog.’ If I don’t get a few threats a year, given my topics of choice, I’m not doing my job very well.

So… Mr Klemens- bring on the writs or shut the fuck up."

Now THAT plea should sound familiar to any who have followed Whitelaw Towers for a while. WE have issued the same challenge to Brian 'Weezil' Stokes SEVERAL times and...guess what?...not a writ, not a summons, not a court order, not a criminal charge or fine or ANYTHING has EVER surfaced! So WHO, precisely, are the paper tigers, the bloated and pumped up bags of wind?

I’m sure the remaining clients you represent would appreciate you not rubbishing their reputations as thoroughly as you’ve trashed that of the already annoying Dylan Lewis.
Comment by weez 08.10.09 @ 11:17 pm
barista wrote:

“Personally I think the insult is shabby and basic…”

As I wrote at the time in response to a comment by ‘kate tyson’:

“you’re right, it’s a mean and nasty comment.

i think i must’ve been in a very bad mood when i wrote that."

Erm...no...you're simply working to form. You are a FUCKWIT and will always remain so.

"my apologies for causing you offence — i’m sure dylan is a swell guy. well, i can’t honestly say i’m sure of it, but it remains a possibility anyway. mind you, i do find his tv persona to be incredibly annoying.”

Whoah thar boy! Can everyone say BACK PEDDLING? Or how about licky, licky, sucky, sucky?

Mean and nasty, yes, but not meant to be taken literally or seriously. That it produced the reaction that it did is, quite frankly, bizarre.
Comment by @ndy 08.10.09 @ 11:51 pm

Bizarre, indeed, @ndy. To paraphrase Dr Cam, someone needs to take a teaspoon of cement and harden the fuck up.

Ha! Ha! Ha! Yeah, the soft, flabby Dr. Camp SexWithMinors would know all about being 'hard' wouldn't he? I particularly like his pink, puffy little hands with those spindly fingers. Somehow we don't think the good doctor ever laid too many bricks or dug too many trenches.

Comment by weez 08.10.09 @ 11:57 pm

Ann, Marshall & Brownie, sorry about the belated appearance of your comments. Akismet made a rare misdiagnosis of your notes as spams. Fixed.
Comment by weez 08.11.09 @ 6:48 am

Ferkin’ idiot … but dangerous perhaps … I see he has young Galbally in his stable - now there’s a family with a mortgage on ‘nasty’.
Comment by John Snelson 08.12.09 @ 7:15 pm

And he’s got Danii Minogue, too. I understand she’s got a mortgage on ‘coat-tails.’
Comment by weez 08.13.09 @ 6:52 am

Don’t you wonder how much Faustina ‘Fuzzy’ Agolley digs being referred to as ‘the resident ‘afro’? Klemens could have called her the ‘token negro’ and been at least as complimentary.
Comment by weez 08.13.09 @ 6:58 am

If Dylan is prostitute it means that Klemens is his pimp. What’s the rate and his hook? Just curious, Dylan, not an offer.
Comment by Melchior 08.13.09 @ 12:33 pm

Weezil "Brian Stokes"eggs on the Atheists

From the MachineGunKeyboard Blog:

Atheist bus ads come to Australia - but not without a struggle

Sunday August 23rd 2009, 7:31 am Atheist Foundation of Australia President David Nicholls has finally persuaded Metro Tasmania to run bus advertising promoting atheism, but not before having to go to conciliation via the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Commission after Metro knocked back the atheist ads in 2008. So, Taswegians will soon be seeing something like this on buses: This text is a bit watered down from the original proposition, which was Atheism: celebrate reason, sleep in on Sunday. This was apparently interpreted as unnecessarily targeting christianity. (sic) I do agree that atheism really should go after religion in general.”

Erm, should that include Islam, and in particular the more fundamentalist and militant strains such as the Wahabists, the Taliban and suchlike?

“Given the prevalence of xianity (sic) in Australia, Australian atheists can on occasion be a bit myopic and fail to address the nonsense propounded by all religions, not just xianity.”(sic)

Again, we ask, have you and/or the ‘Atheists’ got the ‘nads to get medieval on the arses of the Islamists?

“The first approach thus is certainly excusable in Australia on that basis alone, but I suppose the final draft is in the end most appropriate (and less wordy to boot). For the record, I’m still a fan of the text used by Ariane Sherine’s original UK bus ads, There’s (sic) probably no god. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life. Mind you, even that text was softened by the use of the word ‘probably.’ I see no reason for atheists to soften their message.”

Hey, how about THIS for a reason, Weezy. How about they might get their pointy little heads kicked in by certain Religious extremists who don’t exactly respect ANYTHING other than their own kind and could not give a toss about ANY State Law particularly Australian Law? And while you’re so keen to egg these Atheists on are you willing to put your OWN sorry, crippled arse on the frontline? Like all gutless Left Wing agitators and provocateurs you enjoy the safety of being out of range. “Oh, I’m sorry darlings, I’ll be home washing my hair that night while you lot are manning the barricades.”

You fuckwit!

“Religionist advertising has never been subject to such limits, nor have religionists traditionally had to fight to get advertisers to run their tripe. The AFA are now taking a new tack, one that I agree with very strongly. AFA will be asking that religionist adverts be subjected to truth-in-advertising laws.”

Well, let’s face it Weezy old bean, in THAT case the propaganda of the criminal cabal of the Multicultural lobby would see the entire lot successfully prosecuted for false advertising. In case you hadn’t noticed it ain’t exactly what it says on the tin. The label promised us ‘diversity’, ‘enrichment’, ‘harmony’ and, pretty much, Utopia. The crime stats alone indicate otherwise. Let’s not even bother with the plethora of socio-economic studies etc that prove the West in general has gone backwards at a great rate of knots since the unwanted and un voted for cult was foisted upon an unwilling population by the conspirators and their useful idiots in politics and academia.

YOU, Weezy old chum, are just another foot soldier, a disposable idiot, for the system. If you are lucky, once you’ve reached your use by date the kindly Zog Trooper will place his pistol muzzle against the back of your neck and give you the last painkiller you’ll ever need. Your heroes of the old Soviet regime used to refer to this jokingly as ‘wet work’. Or have they promised you a special position in the New Order? You didn’t actually BELIEVE them did you? What a credulous little cripple you are.

“I don’t know how successful this will be, but it’s definitely worth a crack. There’s no proof gods exist,”

Well, there ain’t exactly a lot of proof they DON’T either. So that line of argument’s pretty much immediately redundant.

“so if the letter of the law is obeyed,”

Tsk, tsk,tsk, there you go again. Oh, you Commies just love the ‘letter of the law’ dontcha? But, strangely, only when it favours YOU. Funny that, innit?
“most religious propaganda won’t pass muster.”

There’s CERTAINLY no proof Communism ever did anyone any good (100 Million plus dead just CAN’T be wrong) except the conspirators and perpetrators (and we ALL know who they were/are don’t we folks?)…yet YOU say “What exactly is wrong with Communism?” You are a hypocrite and a moron. No further proof is needed.

-weez

Brian Stokes on Mental Health

Center Brian Stokes "Weezil" co-founder of Fight Dem Back Australian Communist and self hating self abusing Anti White racist

Here, dear readers, for your elucidation and general reading pleasure, are some of the latest ramblings of that lovable old communitarian, tireless and hardworking volunteer, eminently tolerant and all round ‘live and let live’ social libertarian that is Brian ‘Weezil’ Stokes.

What a guy! What a wise old sage he is.

‘tho I do suspect his volunteer work on the Samaritan crisis hotline might be in some jeopardy after the following comments become widely known…*snigger*…

Psst! Brian. You’re supposed to talk the loonies OUT of self harm, old son. What happened to all that warmth, kindness, compassion and love of Humanity stuff you used to preach…maaan? Where DID that golden haired old hippie GO to Brian? You’re bringing us DOWN man with all this heavy shit, maaaaaaaaaaaan!!!

I see Crazy Craig Andrew Betts has found his gloriously hilarious threat to ‘take down’ mgk enshrined in this thread, prompting him to go there and impersonate me. *giggle* Meet Mr Betts, the declared vexatious litigant, drunk driver, mother basher, serial AVO applicant and diagnosed mentally ill fuckbag.

Dr Keller from the Sutherland Shire Mental Health Department says:
“Mr Betts is extremely well known to the Division of Mental Health at Sutherland Hospital.
He has had one admission to our Inpatient Unit as well as sporadic contact with our Acute Care Treatment Team. He frequently corresponds with myself by fax and the content of this correspondence reflects psychotic thought processes and delusional beliefs.
It is my professional opinion that Mr Betts is likely to be currently suffering from a mental illness and that he may well represent a risk to himself and others.

I believe he would benefit from an urgent Mental Health Assessment to determine what treatment is required at this point in time.”

How fucked up can one dickwad be?

The obvious solution for Betts is suicide, but until he tops himself, he’ll be back here harassing the fuck out of everyone. He’s so good at harassment that he’s not allowed to take any legal action in NSW without leave of the Supreme Court of NSW. Now THAT’S some serious asshattery.

SUICIDE, Craig! KILL YOURSELF NOW, you worthless bucket of dogshit.

Comment by weez 05.09.09 @ 3:19 pm

Now, do you gentle readers out there think these are the coolly considered and logical comments of a person with both a firm grip on reality and a strong and healthy impulse control? Do you think they indicate the author is an ethical, morally righteous dude… a shining beacon of truth and hope for the wretched and a model example for the misguided youth of today?…OR… do you, like me, think this bloke is a certifiable head-case, a vicious moral coward, a mental pygmy, so utterly bitter and twisted with sheer blind hatred he cannot even think straight?...AND…

…furthermore, do you think that perhaps, just perhaps, his goading insistence that his intended target kill himself just might, might mind you, constitute, considering the delicate psychological condition of his target, an actual case of attempted murder by proxy? Isn’t telling a loony to kill themselves a bit like handing the nominated lunatic a loaded gun or even placing a banana skin under his foot while he teeters on the parapet? How about just giving him a sly nudge as he prevaricates and ruminates over just HOW he’ll leap into the void from the thirteenth floor?

Either way it’s not exactly RESPONSIBLE behaviour, is it?

Stokesy the Magnificent!

Brian Weezil Stokes’ resumé becomes more extensive and impressive (if you’re easily fooled that is) by the day.

Is there no limit to his talents and achievements? We already knew he was an ex- ‘journalist’, ex-Vietnam protester, ex-American, Greens Party apparatchik, amateur photographer, amateur sleuth, serial litigant, bush lawyer, Blogger and career social welfare recipient but two more revelations in the space of a week have left us stunned and in awe of the sheer spectrum of his experience.

First there was the claim about his having once been a “One Percenter” Outlaw Biker, a Sgt at Arms no less, but then this…

“You know, I've written a couple of bad books in my time, but rarely do I get shortlisted (sic) for literary awards (except in one or two tiny little universities' literary magazines).”

So now he is an author of several books too!

What a guy!

Perhaps that’s how it is when one doesn’t have a real job and is leeching off the Taxpayer. One has lots of time on one’s hands to pursue multiple ‘career’ paths and become a ‘high achiever’….

Pffftbwahahahahaha!!!

“What exactly is wrong with Communism?”

Is this perhaps the weezil aka Brian Stokes quote of the year?

Why mention it again? Well, quite frankly, we at Whitelaw Towers are still shaking our heads with disbelief. Over the years we’ve become used to hearing all sorts of utter claptrap from Darp & Weezil & Co but that one simply took the biscuit.

Curious, is it not, that such a dedicated so-called ‘Anti-Racist’ should be an apologist for the most murderous and Genocidal political ideology in Human history? Why do we say Genocidal? Well, in the case of Russia, there was very clearly a Racial factor at work in the application of Communism.

Look to the Katyn and Vinnitsa incidents as just two of the more notorious where the Jewish Bolshevik Commissars deliberately targeted the best, most intelligent, educated and skilled White European people for their hatred.

Again we are simply amazed at Stokesy’ apparent ignorance of his own hypocrisy but then this skill of ‘doublethink’ appears to be a prerequisite for membership of any Leftist group and in particular FDB.

Here’s just a couple of thoughts for the Red Scum at FDB to mull over:

Starting in 1929 the Kremlin’s top ranking Bolshevik Jew, Lazar Moiseivich Kaganovich aka as The Butcher of Ukraine, was given the task by Stalin of organising the collectivisation of Ukranian farms. The freehold Ukranian farmers known as Kulaks naturally resisted so the NKVD, with the help of regular Red Army troops, went around confiscating crops and livestock claiming the food was needed for the workers of the cities.

During the period up to 1936 another high ranking Jew, Genrikh Yagoda had commanded the NKVD, staffing it almost exclusively with other Jews who had a natural hatred for the proud and nationalist White Ukranians whom they set about persecuting. Between 1933 to 1934 SEVEN MILLION Ukranians died from starvation and exposure in an artificially engineered so-called ‘famine’.

Between 1937 and 1938 tens of thousands of Ukranians from the Vinnitsa region alone, this time including many intellectuals as well as farmers, were rounded up and shot in a deliberate culling of the best, the fittest and the finest. This process was repeated over and again across the Soviet Union and its captive staes by other Jews like Moritz Cohen aka Bela Kuhn in Hungary as another example yet maggots like weezil still won’t admit to a word of it. No, they just sneer and make silly jokes about White Nationalists being paranoid and sneer “Jooooos!” like children.

We suppose they’ll claim again there is no link whatsoever between Jews and Communism despite the inconvenient fact that ALL it’s top leaders have been Jews from Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Luxembourg etc onwards.

Then there was the brutal slaughter in 1940 of 25,700 Polish prisoners of war, again by the NKVD on Stalin’s orders, including the 4000 Polish Army officers who were shot and buried in what was known as the Katyn Forest Massacre. To rub salt into the wounds the Red Scum blamed the Germans and several prominent Nazis were convicted on this and other dodgy evidence at the Nuremberg Trials. It wasn’t until Gorbachev admitted in 1989 that the Reds had done it that the so called Western Democracies knew the truth. This is the filthy, lying excrement that is Communism.

Well we believe Ukranians and the Poles, like many others who have suffered under the yoke of Communism, have every reason in the World to be ‘Anti-Semitic’. And we believe Communism is the most murderous political cult to ever blight the planet.

White Nationalism Never Sleeps and it Never Forgets

FUCK YOU WEEZIL

Spot the Outlaw

Can YOU pick the odd one out?

Weezy the bad arse Outlaw

Okay, so we had kinda promised ourselves we’d try and avoid poking shit at FDB just for the sake of it and leave our comments to things more worthy but this is simply waaay too funny so we couldn’t help but indulge ourselves.

Weezil as Outlaw Biker is simply too much to stomach. The “One Percenter” tag would obviously refer to his I.Q. It certainly can’t be anything else. We mean to say, what sort of Outlaw Club would have him as a member? The Commiecheros? The Lefty Jokers? Stalin’s Slaves? How many ‘One Percenters’ threaten to file off writs to anyone who looks at them sideways?

We’ve never met any outlaws that resort to litigation when a Jehova’s Witness knocks on their door. The usual response from a pissed off biker would be a stream of abuse or a smack in the mouth. What does ol’ Weezy do? Why he takes photographs of all their vehicles including the interiors and showing the rego plate numbers and posts them on the internet. Then he lodges official complaints with the Police, the church and the council!!! Also, how many big, tough bikers do you know who stalk and threaten skinny, pencil necked kids? Even E-Mailing the minor in question on his birthday with his birth details just so the young bloke would know he’d been (FDB term here)…owned.

Nope, Weez is no biker or outlaw or even a common, garden variety anti-hero. He is quite simply an absolutely gutless fucking CREEP! An über nerd with a severe mental condition, possibly a psychosis. A criminally insane freak and welfare parasite who should have his citizenship revoked immediately and be deported straight back to the shit hole he oozed out of.

weezil
political tar baby
Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 1903
Location: Born and bred in the briar patch
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:34 am

“Quite a lot of OMCs are hardcore racist.”

Hmmm! Quite the professor our Weez, eh?

“Very few, on the other hand, want much unnecessary publicity.”

Now that sounds suspiciously like one of Weez’s famously subtle and cryptic threats. Might the Satans Slaves MC, the Bandidos and others who ‘flirt’ with White Nationalists expect some unwanted ‘fame’ courtesy of Mr. Brian Stokes? We wonder if they might appreciate some helpful information regarding their nemesis…

“You don't run a club long if you act like Nic Miller.”

And…like…erm…you’d know Weez?

weezil
political tar baby
Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 1903
Location: Born and bred in the briar patch
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:57 pm

Lew Archer wrote:

Cheers for that reply, weezil. Would you say the same goes for the Hell's Angels and Highway 61?

“I don't know H61 well enough to comment.”

Well that hasn’t slowed you up in the past. Comment away Weez…

“However, the Angels are definitely racists,”

Hey, that’s strange because we’ve personally seen several with quite dark complexions.

“but not usually in an organised, public campaigning sort of way. Angels are usually quiet except for the media attention they want, i.e. from poker runs to benefit children's charities, etc. I've seen Angels road captains kick asses when probies get too noticeably uppity and noisy.”

This author has been in and around the bike scene for about thirty years and has never heard the term “probies” used, ever. Perhaps he means ‘Prospects’ or ‘Noms’? We think he’s spent too many hours reading Hunter. S. Thompson’s ‘Hells Angels’ and treating it like it’s a documentary. If Sonny Barger hadn’t intervened on more than one occasion he would’ve copped even more than just the one righteous stomping he did get. That is what a total fuckstick Weez’s hero was and he’s obviously modeled himself on him…machine gun masturbator.

“It's not 1967 anymore...”

Well, it is for you, isn’t it Stokesy?

“and even the Angels know that if they want to be largely left alone, excessive meeeeeja attention is a bad thing,”

There’s that subtle threat again…

“though many journos will hack on the bikies regardless if there's a deadline looming and no decent wowser tale to print.”

We’re sure the Big Red Machine is gunna love reading through your file Weez especially the bit about you being a ‘journalist’.

“Why the Slaves cancelled this gig could be related to that sort of MO.”

weezil
political tar baby
Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 1906
Location: Born and bred in the briar patch
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:18 am

@ndy wrote:
The club obviously craves publicity (for some reason best left to their chief of security and Nic Miller to explain).

“Hey, far be it from me to tell any OMC how to do their job. I can say that having once upon a time been a 1%er who also was a road captain and later sgt-at-arms, that no one in my club ever got busted for poor infosec (at least not for 'family' matters, as it were).”

We believe “road captain” actually refers to Coach Captain when Stokesy was supervising the annual Zimmer frame relay bus tour of Albuquerque back in the Sixties. We had a chat among the lads at Whitelaw Towers and agreed the only people who we have ever heard use the term "road captain" are the geriatrics of the Ulysses Club. Nice one Weez...

Remember folks, all this egoistic waffle is coming from an utterly delusional Elmer Fudd facsimile who can’t tell a Duke from a Kawasaki or a Belt from a Bevel Drive and who states categorically, with no qualifications, that Ducatis are “shit”. Hmmm, 916 through to 1098 anyone? Someone had better tell Troy Bayliss and Casey Stoner they’re riding shitboxes too! Ha! Ha! Ha!

When it comes to ‘expertise’ on two wheeled machines he’s as much an authority as Darp is an historian…not much. Seriously, what this sad git knows about motorcycles and bike clubs you could write on the back of a postage stamp.